Structured Data Audit

An assessment of what the site currently tells machines about itself through markup, and where that description is wrong, missing or inconsistent.

Where This Sits

9

Components in the finished document

4

Measured directly, not asserted

4

Pieces that carry my judgment

This is a Diagnostics deliverable, which means it establishes what is true about the site now. It is the unit of scope: it can be commissioned on its own, priced on its own, and accepted on its own, whether or not anything else is bought alongside it.

It is not a package and not a retainer. It is one document with 9 components, and the list below is the whole of it.

What Is Inside It

Every component is listed with the one sentence that says what it is. They are grouped by how each one is produced, because the difference between a number a tool gave me and a number I decided matters more than most reports admit.

Measured

Pulled straight from tools and logs. No interpretation, so you can re-run any of it yourself and get the same numbers.

Validation error log
Every structured data error and warning, grouped by template and severity.
Property completeness table
Required and recommended properties present or absent for each declared type.
Rich result eligibility table
Which enhanced results each template currently qualifies for, and what blocks the rest.
Competitor comparison table
The same measurements taken across named competitors, so the gap is quantified rather than described.

Computed

Built by combining the measurements above. Every figure states the inputs it came from.

Schema coverage matrix
Which schema types appear on which templates, and which are missing.

Judged

My reading of the evidence. This is the part you are actually paying for, and the part you are entitled to argue with.

Entity map, current state
The entities the site currently describes and how they are connected, as machines would read it today.
Sample markup extract
The actual markup emitted by one representative page per template.
Severity-scored finding card
One issue, stated with its evidence, its severity, and the likelihood it causes harm if left alone.
Prioritised recommendation list
Every recommendation in the order it should be acted on, with the reason for that order.

Commission This Deliverable

If this is the document your team is missing, or you want it adapted to a portfolio, a migration, or an in-house standard, the conversation starts here.