Topic And Entity Model

The concept graph the site needs to own to be understood by machines, and how its pages should express it.

Where This Sits

5

Components in the finished document

1

Measured directly, not asserted

3

Pieces that carry my judgment

This is a Opportunity deliverable, which means it sizes the demand before budget is committed. It is the unit of scope: it can be commissioned on its own, priced on its own, and accepted on its own, whether or not anything else is bought alongside it.

It is not a package and not a retainer. It is one document with 5 components, and the list below is the whole of it.

What Is Inside It

Every component is listed with the one sentence that says what it is. They are grouped by how each one is produced, because the difference between a number a tool gave me and a number I decided matters more than most reports admit.

Measured

Pulled straight from tools and logs. No interpretation, so you can re-run any of it yourself and get the same numbers.

Content gap table
Topics competitors cover and the site does not, sized by demand.

Computed

Built by combining the measurements above. Every figure states the inputs it came from.

Topic cluster plan
How topics group into pillars and supporting pages, and how those pages link.

Judged

My reading of the evidence. This is the part you are actually paying for, and the part you are entitled to argue with.

Entity map, target state
The entities the site should describe and how they should connect, as a specification to build against.
Keyword to URL map
Every target query assigned to the single page meant to answer it.
Assumptions statement
Every assumption the analysis rests on, named so a reader can challenge it.

Commission This Deliverable

If this is the document your team is missing, or you want it adapted to a portfolio, a migration, or an in-house standard, the conversation starts here.