Prioritisation Matrix

Every recommendation placed by impact against effort, with severity and likelihood attached, so the order is defensible.

Where This Sits

5

Components in the finished document

1

Measured directly, not asserted

3

Pieces that carry my judgment

This is a Direction deliverable, which means it turns findings into a sequence. It is the unit of scope: it can be commissioned on its own, priced on its own, and accepted on its own, whether or not anything else is bought alongside it.

It is not a package and not a retainer. It is one document with 5 components, and the list below is the whole of it.

What Is Inside It

Every component is listed with the one sentence that says what it is. They are grouped by how each one is produced, because the difference between a number a tool gave me and a number I decided matters more than most reports admit.

Measured

Pulled straight from tools and logs. No interpretation, so you can re-run any of it yourself and get the same numbers.

Effort estimate table
Engineering, content and analyst effort per initiative, in the units the client's team actually plans in.

Computed

Built by combining the measurements above. Every figure states the inputs it came from.

Impact and effort scatter
All findings plotted on impact against effort, so the sequencing argument is visible rather than asserted.

Judged

My reading of the evidence. This is the part you are actually paying for, and the part you are entitled to argue with.

Severity-scored finding card
One issue, stated with its evidence, its severity, and the likelihood it causes harm if left alone.
Scoring rubric
How severity and likelihood were assigned, so the ratings are reproducible rather than opinions.
Prioritised recommendation list
Every recommendation in the order it should be acted on, with the reason for that order.

Commission This Deliverable

If this is the document your team is missing, or you want it adapted to a portfolio, a migration, or an in-house standard, the conversation starts here.